Private equity can be a powerful engine for growth, but if India copies the most aggressive global playbooks, it risks quietly weakening essential businesses and public systems while everyone celebrates deal flow and returns. Private equity has shown it can help companies professionalise, expand, and unlock value by bringing in capital, expertise, and sharper governance.
At the same time, the US experience shows how PE can turn vital services such as hospitals, schools, utilities, and food retail into high-yield assets that are run primarily for extraction, not resilience or public benefit. The typical playbook on the darker side is now familiar: buy with heavy debt, cut costs aggressively, extract cash through fees and dividends, and exit before the long-term consequences fully appear.
For a few years, financial metrics look excellent; then service quality erodes, workers absorb the pain, and the system is left holding the risk once the fund has moved on. In the US, large PE funds now own significant chunks of healthcare, education, food retail, security services, and other labour-intensive sectors.
Studies and experience show that public companies taken private by PE are far more likely to go bankrupt than similar firms that are not leveraged in this way, because heavy debt plus short-term extraction leaves little buffer for shocks. After buyouts, wages in these sectors often fall and headcount shrinks over a couple of years, pushing the cost of “value creation” onto workers with the least bargaining power.
India attracted roughly USD 36 billion of PE-VC investments in 2025, with capital leaning towards consumer, manufacturing, financial services, healthcare, and IT/ITeS sectors anchored in the domestic economy. For business leaders, this looks like an opportunity: more capital, more deals, more growth.
Related: BW Businessworld unveils latest industry insights
The risk lies not in “PE” as a label, but in the structure of deals and the sectors they target. If high-leverage, tight-control transactions push deep into hospitals, utilities, schools, low-wage services, food retail, and non-bank finance, India could end up replicating US-style vulnerabilities.
Those vulnerabilities show up as higher prices for basics, lower reliability and quality of essential services, and a rise in financial distress and insolvency among acquired entities, with more cases under the IBC and larger creditor haircuts. Layered ownership structures like LLPs, trusts, and offshore vehicles make it easier for sponsors to exercise control with less transparency, arbitraging across SEBI, RBI, IRDAI, TRAI, CCI and sector regulators.
Lobbying by industry groups can then slowly dilute rules governing hospitals, schools, utilities, insurance, NBFCs and other critical players, especially if compliance is treated as a cost to be minimised rather than a non-negotiable guardrail. When PE ownership penetrates sectors that look like “normal businesses” but in reality provide public goods, misaligned incentives show up quickly.
In hospital and diagnostic networks linked to insurance, fee optimisation and return maximisation can drive overuse of profitable procedures and tests, chronic understaffing, skimping on maintenance, and tight cost control on anything that does not immediately show up as revenue. For higher-income patients this may mean frustration and higher bills; for lower-income patients it can mean worse clinical outcomes and higher mortality.
The system looks modern and efficient on the surface but becomes structurally fragile underneath, with less slack to absorb mistakes or crises. Similar patterns emerge when PE moves into private utilities such as power distribution, water and waste management, urban transport concessions, and food retail chains.
Related: Amit Shah on his rise from a morning with BW Businessworld
For Indian business leaders, investors and policymakers, the immediate task is to audit where PE already sits in their ecosystem across healthcare, utilities, education, retail and finance and to distinguish between deals that build long-term capability and those that rely on leverage and extraction. Contracts should be pushed to reflect labour, service quality and ESG obligations as enforceable covenants rather than soft promises.
At the ecosystem level, working with regulators and industry bodies to build leverage caps, ownership transparency and serious stress-testing in critical sectors can prevent the worst outcomes of aggressive PE playbooks. Championing alternative capital sources for public goods ensures that private equity becomes one option among many, not the default owner of the systems citizens depend upon every day.
India can harness the potential of private equity for growth while minimizing its risks by taking a careful approach. This requires prioritizing the needs of citizens and the long-term health of essential businesses and public systems, as seen in the job growth sector.
Business leaders must balance the benefits of private equity with the potential risks to create a more sustainable and equitable economy.